bengals vs green bay packers match player stats

Introduction

When the Cincinnati Bengals take on the Green Bay Packers, it’s more than just another regular season NFL game. These teams have history, heart, and a mix of talent that makes their matchups compelling. In this article, we’ll break down the latest Bengals vs. Packers game, go deep into player stats, explore what made the difference, and analyze key performances. We’ll also put the game in context with head-to-head history and what it means for both teams moving forward.

Historical Context: Bengals vs. Packers Rivalry

All-Time Series and Trends

The Packers and Bengals have met 15 times in the regular season, with Green Bay holding a slight edge in the series.
According to Packer.land, the Packers lead 8–7 in all-time matchups.
Historically, the teams have traded wins back and forth, meaning there’s no long-standing dominance by one side — every game feels fresh.

Statistical Rivalry

Over their entire history, the Bengals average about 21.1 points per game, while the Packers average 22.2, per Stathead.
In head-to-head passing totals, the Bengals have completed 267 out of 435 attempts for 2,602 yards, with 24 touchdowns vs. 14 interceptions.
On the ground, the Bengals have run 456 times for 1,800 yards (3.9 yards per carry), while the Packers have 426 rushes for 1,688 yards (4.0 YPC) in those head-to-head games.

This tells us that even over decades, both teams have kept it relatively even, with slightly different stylistic leanings.

Defensive Matchups

When it comes to defense, Cincinnati has recorded 46 sacks against Green Bay in their matchups, while the Packers have managed 38.
Interceptions in their meetings also lean toward Cincinnati, with 22 picks vs. 14 by Green Bay.

The 2025 Week 6 Clash: Game Recap & Key Numbers

Final Result and Team Performance

On October 12, 2025, the Bengals visited the Packers at Lambeau Field and lost 27–18.
Green Bay dominated total offense, racking up 409 yards compared to just 268 by Cincinnati.
Time of possession was also tilted in favor of the Packers: 32:44 vs 27:16 for the Bengals.

Passing Metrics

Joe Flacco, starting for the Bengals, went 29/45 for 219 yards and 2 touchdowns, without an interception.
For the Packers, Jordan Love completed 19 of 26 for 259 yards and 1 touchdown.
In terms of yards per attempt, the Packers averaged a much more explosive 9.8 yards/pass, while the Bengals were at 4.7 yards/pass.

Rushing Attack

The Bengals struggled to run, with just 55 total rushing yards on the day.
By contrast, Green Bay ran for 153 yards, averaging 4.6 yards per carry.

Turnovers

Cincinnati didn’t commit any turnovers in this game, which is notable given their offensive inefficiency.
Green Bay, on the other hand, turned the ball over once.

Spotlight on Key Players

Bengals

Joe Flacco (Quarterback)

The veteran QB, newly acquired by the Bengals, showed poise despite inconsistency. Flacco went 29/45, throwing 2 touchdowns and avoiding interceptions.
Given the lack of a reliable run game, Flacco was asked to shoulder much of the offensive load.
While he showed flashes, his average of 4.7 yards per pass suggests the offense wasn’t consistently pushing the ball downfield.

Ja’Marr Chase (Wide Receiver)

Chase was Flacco’s go-to target, hauling in 10 catches for 94 yards and a touchdown.
His route-running and ability to make contested catches helped keep the Bengals in the game.
But without consistent support in other areas, his production alone couldn’t carry Cincinnati.

Running Back Group

The Bengals struggled to run the ball: key backs combined for only 55 rushing yards.
Chris Brown led the team’s rushers, with 42 yards on 9 carries.
Samaje Perine added 16 yards on 6 attempts, while Ja’Marr Chase even had a carry (–3 yards) that didn’t help.

Receiving Depth

Beyond Chase, Tee Higgins had 5 receptions for 62 yards, proving to be a useful second option.
Tanner Hudson was involved in the scoring, catching a 2-yard TD from Flacco.
However, beyond those three, the Bengals’ receiving corps didn’t make enough impact to shift momentum significantly.

Packers

Jordan Love (Quarterback)

Love was efficient in this game: 19 completions on 26 attempts, for 259 yards and a touchdown.
He showed good decision-making under pressure and distributed the ball well.
His deep pass average (9.8 yards/pass) indicates he was aggressive in attacking multiple levels of the defense.

Josh Jacobs (Running Back)

Jacobs was a driving force for Green Bay’s success. He logged 18 carries for 93 yards, scoring 2 rushing touchdowns.
His ability to punch it in on the ground gave the Packers second-half control.
Jacobs’ effectiveness on zone reads and power runs made him hard to stop, especially as the Bengals’ defense gassed.

Matthew Golden (Rookie Receiver)

One of the breakout stars: Golden showed explosive potential. According to analyses, he posted 86 receiving yards on 3 catches, plus 16 rushing yards on 2 rushes.
His yards after catch were especially impressive, highlighting his speed and playmaking ability.
Golden’s performance suggests he could be a real weapon in Green Bay’s offense moving forward.

Other Contributors

The Packers’ passing game wasn’t limited to Love and Golden. Even with limited attempts, they made the most of each possession.
Tucker Kraft, their tight end, caught a touchdown pass that proved pivotal.
Green Bay’s offensive balance — a strong run game complemented by timely passing — allowed them to sustain drives and finish efficiently.

Tactical Breakdown & What Worked

Bengals’ Struggles

One-dimensional Offense: Cincinnati couldn’t establish the run, forcing Flacco into passing situations that limited play variety.
Predictability: Without a dynamic run threat, the Packers’ defense could focus more on pass coverage and contain Chase.
Lack of Explosive Plays: The Bengals had trouble generating chunk plays, which killed drives and limited field-flipping opportunities.

Packers’ Strengths

Ground Game Control: Jacobs was the linchpin — not just in yardage, but in finishing drives and controlling the clock.
Efficient Passing: Love didn’t force throws; he was accurate, smart, and capitalized on matchups.
Playmaking from Unexpected Places: Golden’s breakout outing added a wrinkle to Green Bay’s offense, making them less predictable.

Game Flow & Key Moments

After a scoreless first quarter, Green Bay struck in the second with a field goal and a Jacobs touchdown run.
Cincinnati responded in the third quarter when Flacco found Tanner Hudson for a 2-yard rushing touchdown, narrowing the gap.
In the fourth, the Packers extended their lead — first via Love’s touchdown to Kraft, then Jacobs pounded in another rushing score to pull away.
A late field goal (39 yards by Lucas Havrisik) sealed the deal for Green Bay.

Defensive Analysis: How the Defenses Matched Up

Bengals’ Defense

While Cincinnati didn’t force a turnover, they made some stops when needed.
Their pass rush didn’t consistently get home, which allowed Love time to work in the pocket.
Against the run, the Bengals seemed vulnerable, especially in late-game situations when the Packers leaned on Jacobs.

Packers’ Defense

The Packers defense showed discipline: they limited the Bengals’ run game, holding them to 55 yards.
In pass coverage, they managed to contain Chase fairly well when it counted, forcing Cincinnati to rely on predictable short throws.
Green Bay’s defensive front helped pave the way for their offense by giving favorable field position and making tackling in open space more manageable.

Key Takeaways & Implications

For the Bengals

Need for a Reliable Run Game: Without a consistent rushing threat, Flacco will continue to bear the brunt of the offense, making the team more one-dimensional.
Play-Calling Adjustments: To maximize Chase and Higgins, the Bengals might need to incorporate more play-action and misdirection.
Veteran QB, But Not a Magic Fix: Flacco’s experience helps, but he’s not a long-term solution. The Bengals will need other areas — offensive line, receiver depth — to develop if they want sustained success.

For the Packers

Balanced Attack is Paying Off: The Jacobs-Love combo gives Green Bay flexibility and makes them hard to defend.
Emerging Weapons: Matthew Golden could become a key piece, giving them an explosive and reliable option outside of established names.
Defensive Stability: They defended well when needed, especially late in the game, which speaks to their discipline and ability to close out games.

Bigger Picture

This win boosts Green Bay’s confidence: controlling the clock, making big plays, and finishing drives shows they can compete against tough matchups.
For the Bengals, the loss exposes underlying issues. If they want to climb in the standings, they’ll need to fix their offensive identity and shore up defensive gaps.

Historical Relevance and Future Outlook

Given the all-time series is nearly even (8–7 in favor of the Packers), every game between these two teams has weight — not just for that season but as part of a larger rivalry.
With young players like Golden emerging and veterans like Flacco still contributing, the trajectory for both teams can swing either way. The Bengals may lean into a retool, while the Packers might double down on their current balance.
Looking ahead, these matchups could continue to be pivotal. If Greene Bay continues to integrate youth with experience, they could build on this win. Meanwhile, Cincinnati will need to re-evaluate and perhaps re-invest in their run game or offensive line to avoid similar offensive struggles.

Conclusion

The Bengals vs. Packers clash in Week 6 of the 2025 NFL season was a telling game. It highlighted the strengths and vulnerabilities of both teams. Green Bay, with a balanced offense and breakout performances, took control and closed out at home. Cincinnati, despite flashes from Flacco and Chase, couldn’t quite get the balance they needed to sustain drives and threaten consistently.

From a player-stats perspective, Josh Jacobs was the workhorse, Jordan Love was precise and efficient, and Matthew Golden grabbed attention as a rising playmaker. On the Bengals’ side, Flacco showed grit, Chase made his usual impact, but the lack of a ground game really cost them.

If you’re a Bengals fan, this game is a wake-up call — there’s talent, but execution needs to improve. If you’re a Packers supporter, there’s optimism: this might be the kind of foundation that carries them forward.

Ultimately, matchups like these matter not just for the standings, but for the identity of each franchise. As the season unfolds, how both teams respond to this one will be very telling.